See Nick's latest post on "Environmental Pharisaism" here. Here's an excerpt:
I am waiting for someone to explain to me why certain environmentalists argue that it is wrong to kill animals for food, but not plants. Are plants any less valuable than animals? Why do some environmentalists apply this particular hierarchy to living things? Well, for one, if you place the same criterion on plants as you do on animals, then what would you be able to eat to survive? To be consistent with their belief system, these environmentalists would have to consistently reverse the order of intrinsic value to make mankind (image bearers of God) less valuable than animals and plants. The inevitable outcome of this system–were it consistent–is cannibalism.




0 comments:
Post a Comment